For the past few
years I’ve enjoyed being in an open relationship. This has been a wonderful
path of growth to explore. Sure it subjects you to some extra criticism, but
most of that gets out of the way in the first day or two, so in the long run
it’s negligible. The rewards of this type of exploration are far greater than
the drawbacks IMO.
I’m grateful for
having tried the monogamous marriage path for more than a decade, but I wouldn’t
want to spend the rest of my life living that way. I feel very appreciative
that I’m well along in this new phase of my relationship life now, one that
gives me a sense of possibility and abundance.
One area I haven’t
explored yet is the idea of three-person relationships. By this I mean a triad
of people who consider themselves to be in a relationship with each other to
the same extent that a couple might declare themselves to be “in a
relationship” together.
As in all
relationships, it’s the people in a given relationship who define the scope,
structure, and boundaries of that relationship, so just as a two-person
relationship could have all sorts of variations, the same is true for
three-person relationships.
The two most common
forms of three-person relationships are Vs and triangles. In a V-style
relationship, one person has individual bonds with the other two partners, but
those other partners would not consider themselves to be in a relationship with
each other. So the letter V itself is a visualization of that type of
relationship, with each person being at one of the three points of the
V. A common situation where you might find a V structure is with a couple
where one member of the couple also has a lover on the side.
In a triangle type
of relationship, all three people consider themselves to be in relationship
with each other. You might see such a relationship with one man and two
bisexual women, for instance. All sorts of variations are possible, with the
structure and parameters being determined by the members.
Polyfidelity is a
label that can be applied to relationships with three or more people, whereby
the relationship is in some way closed to outsiders. The members of the group
may prefer to restrict sexual connections to within the group only, and/or they
may not want anyone in the group falling in love with an outsider. This is
basically the poly version of a monogamous relationship, so it has its own
definition of cheating.
Openness
When it comes to
exploring open relationships, some people are passively open while others are
more actively open. Passive openness means that you’re not actively seeking out
new partners, but if an opportunity comes to you fairly easily, you may be
inclined to accept the invitation and enjoy it. Active openness means that
you proactively invite new connections instead of only passively waiting for
them to show up.
Over the past three
years, I’ve oscillated between both of these postures. Sometimes I’ve been
pretty passive, mainly enjoying my connection with my girlfriend and enjoying
an occasional threesome. Other times I’ve felt like being more proactive, so I
put out invites for the types of connections I wanted to experience.
If I want more
connections, I can hold a more actively open posture and be more flirtatious
and inviting. If I feel like being in my own space for a while, I may switch to
passive-open or even closed (where I’d turn down new connections when offered).
People normally
switch between active, passive, and closed modes with casual social invites,
choosing a posture that gives them what they want, and it’s not difficult to
extend this dynamic into less casual connections.
I really like
blending the benefits of monogamy with the experience of openness. I love
having a stable girlfriend and the love, intimacy, and special connection that
we share. I also love being able to connect with other women when the
opportunity arises or I have a proactive desire to do so. And I especially love
playing with Rachelle and another woman together.
When people ask me
about my relationship life, I think they sometimes expect to hear stories of
drama and problems due to the openness factor, but the reality is that it’s
very easy, flowing, loving, and fun.
Three-Person
Relationships
Recently Rachelle
and I have been discussing new ways we could continue to learn, explore, and
grow together. One idea that we’re certain about is travel. We love going on
extended trips together, so there’s no doubt we’ll keep doing more of that.
A bigger stretch we
began talking about recently was the idea of experiencing a three-person
relationship with another woman. We’ve played with other women together and
have quite enjoyed that. What would it be like to share a deeper level of
intimacy with someone else for a longer stretch of time? We can’t answer
that question since we’ve never tried this.
That said, as we
discussed this possibility, we realized that we’re actually in agreement with
what we’d want in another partner if we were to be in a triangle-style
relationship (a V-style one doesn’t appeal to us). The other woman would have
to be vegan, bisexual, compassionate, growth-oriented, smart, cuddly, honest,
responsible, mild tempered, playfully submissive, open to lots of D/s play, and
have a love of travel like we do. And obviously she’d need sufficient freedom
and availability to enter into this kind of exploration with us in person.
Even this short
list of criteria will rule out most women, and that’s fine with us. We wouldn’t
want to attempt this with just anyone. She’d have to be someone pretty unusual,
just like us. 
We could be more
flexible, which gives us a higher chance of finding a match, but Rachelle and I
agree that we’d rather not compromise. We need sufficient compatibility in our
lifestyle desires and values to give us a good base for connecting, but other
differences are fine since that’s where we can learn from each other.
So why am I sharing
this? Are we taking applications or something? Mainly I wanted to share this
because it helps me lean into it and get comfortable with the idea.
As far as ideas go,
this one both excites and scares me. I think it could be an amazing amount of
fun and a wonderful challenge for the heart and mind alike. But I’d be very
selective about letting anyone into this exploration with us in such an
intimate way, and Rachelle is very selective too. I’m not into relationship
drama, and I don’t want to invite someone in who’d seek to mess up the
connection between Rachelle and me.
So at this point my
stance is somewhere between passive open and active open. I’m open to the
possibility if the right person should pop onto our radar, but I haven’t
actively gone out and invited anyone to actually try this with us.
Advantages
Three-person
relationships have some interesting advantages over two-person relationships.
Some are practical while others are just about increasing the fun and
stimulation.
If the three people
live together, then there’s a bit less work for each person in terms of daily
tasks like making meals. It’s not that much more work to make dinner for three
people vs. two. Similarly, one person could research and make reservations for
a trip that all three could take.
Some activities are
just more enjoyable with a third person due to the added energy. A good example
would be receiving a two-on-one massage. Another would be having a threesome. I
imagine you’d want to maintain good physical fitness if you expect to do a lot
of that together.
In a monogamous
two-person relationship, if your partner declines a certain activity invite,
you’re out of luck, unless you want to invite a friend who lives further away.
But in a three-person relationship, you can just go and ask the other person,
and maybe you’ll get a yes. So for any two-person activities, you have two
people you can ask, thus increasing your chances of having someone available.
If you have a
problem to solve, you can have a three-way discussion about it, which helps
compensate for individual biases. You also have the knowledge, talents, and
support of an extra person at your disposal.
Many of the
advantages of three-person relationships are the same that arise in families or
teams, but some are specific to intimate connections, like being able to cuddle
with two lovers at once, or having two people get to know you very deeply.
Consent
While a
three-person relationship may sound complicated or difficult to initiate, all
it takes is for three like-minded people to consent to it. Each person may have
different reasons for wanting to invite such an experience, but as long as
their desires are compatible, they can create this experience.
If it works out
well, wonderful. If it doesn’t work out so well, it will surely be an
interesting learning experience.
I don’t necessarily
expect such a three-person connection to be super stable in the long run. I figure
it will probably be more temporary than a two-person connection, partly because
three-person connections are easier to break up (only one in three people has
to decide to leave). I think it could be a really fascinating thing to explore
even if it doesn’t last long. All human experiences are temporary anyway.
Consent alone,
however, isn’t quite enough for me. I’d also want us to have compatible
intentions as to why we’d want to explore such a relationship. Mine would be to
learn, grow, explore, share love and intimacy, make people feel good, and have
a ridiculous amount of fun together. Rachelle and I already have this kind of
connection, so while it would be a stretch to invite a third person into this,
I think it has a fair chance of creating even more joy for three people, at
least for a while.
Whether this type
of connection works out well or quickly goes bust, I think it’s worth the risk
to try it. Rachelle and I have been enjoying an open relationship since we
first got together, so we aren’t coming from a traditional place to begin with.
We also have years of practice with open, honest, communication. And we find it
very easy to keep connecting from a place of love. I don’t realistically see
our connection being threatened by adding another person to it, as long as we
hold to our values and select someone like-minded. I think it’s more likely
that our two-person connection could morph into something even greater.
I must admit that
even to me, this idea feels a bit weird. But I tend to do well with ideas that
once seemed weird to me, such as making a living from blogging or moving to Las
Vegas. So given my track record with weird ideas, I have the honest expectation
that if we do find someone who’s a good match for this, it will probably work
out beautifully. And if it happens to go the way ofpolyphasic sleep,
then at least it will make for a tremendous growth experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment